I consulted the record date for a public inquiry of the parcel AM 172.
The register kept at the disposal of audience was on Thursday late afternoon devoid of any inscription.
The record is more than summary: a sample of the municipal council of April 2, 2010, two photos from the field, two copies of the SOP on the parcel AM 172 the one without the other with a ring of Access to the construction zone. No order of an administrative court deciding a public inquiry or documentation of any entity of State ...
During a brief exchange, the Mayor told me:
- she had been asked to initiate proceedings for rectification of mistake material
- that to his knowledge no building permit was planned,
- it had no knowledge or disclosure of the record written by the ASA following the appointment you December 2,
- was in any case, it would not allow construction stage, except perhaps a basement.
Implicitly, at least you can deduce the one hand it has decided to initiate this procedure for correction of clerical error without considering its implications for wood, and secondly it is not opposed to a construction project.
same time the record maintenance of the SAA with the Mayor says:
"The building permit has been requested by Mr. Zerina (Parcel AM 172 linden rd) we hope that the service of the City Council will contact the ASA on presentation. Indeed, it is conceivable that a building will be built. The President reaffirmed the vigilance of the SAA that, if built, it will remain like "house special natural ability." The Mayor agrees with the vision ASA on this point. "
The SAA and the Mayor agree: we can build!
However, the ASA has recognized in its minutes of AG, "the vast majority of Cisiens campaigning fiercely to preserve the integrity of the designated site.
The Owl Has she right? know what the ASA? What does the Mayor?
pity at our last AGM, as for any consultation on "what do you want to POS? " ASA was not able to conduct a debate and offer options so that it implements the decision of Cisiens!
0 comments:
Post a Comment